Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -126

The statement criticizes Kamala Harris for what the author perceives as hypocrisy in her stance on climate change, given her administration's actions on oil production and fracking. The tone is accusatory and uses strong language such as 'shameless gaslighting.' The intent appears to be to call out perceived inconsistencies in public policy and rhetoric.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('shameless gaslighting') which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, thus violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of the term 'gaslighting' could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a personal attack ('pretend she’s fighting climate change') and an ad hominem argument ('shameless gaslighting'). [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to its accusatory and inflammatory tone. [-1]