Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically immigration policy and political stances of public figures.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a critical tone that could be seen as divisive. It does not promote harm but could be more constructive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It criticizes political figures and policies without attacking individuals personally. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism rather than fostering dialogue or empathy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it is not constructive.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion. However, it could be more responsible and constructive in its tone. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.