Reposted by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
mike casca
@cascamike
·
49d
The statement 'JD Vance could never' in response to a tweet about a public figure helping with a car battery issue is lighthearted and appears to be a playful jab at JD Vance, suggesting he would not be able to do the same. The tone is humorous and informal, and it does not engage in substantive public discourse about societal issues or policies.
- The statement does not cause harm; it is a lighthearted comment.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it is not intended to do so.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a playful comment rather than a serious critique.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.