Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage with significant public issues, specifically the U.S. foreign policy regarding Israel and Gaza, and the ethical implications of political support for such policies. The tone is highly critical and accusatory, aiming to influence public opinion and voting behavior.
- The statement aims to do no harm by advocating against what it perceives as support for atrocities. However, the language used is highly charged and could contribute to polarization.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of individuals but is harshly critical of public figures, which could be seen as a form of political attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes empathy and compassion for the people of Gaza but does so in a manner that could incite strong emotions and divisiveness. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather condemns the actions of specific political figures, which could be seen as personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion and voting behavior, aiming for what it perceives as the betterment of society by advocating for third-party candidates. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.