Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of voting strategy and political accountability, which are significant public concerns. The tone is assertive and aims to challenge conventional wisdom about voting for third-party candidates.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a critique of political strategy rather than an attack on individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and encourages voters to think critically about their electoral power, which can foster empathy and compassion for those seeking political change. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a political strategy without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By encouraging voters to demand significant policy shifts, the statement uses influence for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss electoral strategy and political accountability. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.