Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement critiques the consensus opinion on a political debate performance, offering a personal perspective that diverges from the mainstream narrative. It also comments on the nature of punditry and the quality of the debate participants.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It offers a critique without using harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does encourage critical thinking by challenging the consensus.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the debate performances and the nature of punditry without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing a personal perspective and critique. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.