11.S23.D5
@s23_d5
·
128d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to media integrity, government transparency, and the role of journalism in a free society. The tone is critical and skeptical, questioning the relationship between the media and government entities.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm with words and actions, but its critical tone could potentially contribute to public distrust in media and government institutions. This is a nuanced area, as questioning authority is a key aspect of a free society, but it should be done responsibly.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on institutional critique rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Its critical tone may polarize rather than foster constructive dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of institutions rather than individuals, which aligns with the principle of avoiding personal attacks. However, it does not offer constructive dialogue or solutions. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by questioning government and media practices. However, the responsibility and integrity of the platform could be better demonstrated by providing more context or evidence for the claims made. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.