In reply to:
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
477d
The statement criticizes journalists and media professionals for uncritically repeating talking points provided by political aides and spokespeople, suggesting that this behavior is embarrassing and lacks integrity. The tone is somewhat mocking and dismissive, aiming to call out a perceived lack of independence and critical thinking in the media.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a mocking tone that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use a dismissive tone that could be seen as undermining the dignity of journalists. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it uses a critical and somewhat mocking tone. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a way that could be seen as a personal attack on the integrity of journalists, rather than focusing on constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to call out perceived issues in media practices, but the tone could be more responsible and respectful. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.