Keith Edwards
@keithedwards
·
47d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a public debate about political figures and their effectiveness, which is a substantive public issue.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is dismissive and derisive towards Jill Stein, which can be seen as harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of Jill Stein, as it engages in a form of public shaming and ridicule. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism and derision. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against Jill Stein. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does exercise free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it engages in personal attacks rather than substantive discussion. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.