In reply to:
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
@AOC
·
490d
Keith Edwards
@keithedwards
·
490d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public figure (AOC) and addresses a significant public issue (accusations of supporting genocide). The tone is accusatory and confrontational, and the intent appears to be to criticize and challenge AOC's political stance and actions.
- The statement does harm by making a serious accusation without providing evidence, which can damage reputations and incite hostility. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and can be seen as a form of harassment or cyberbullying by making an unfounded and severe accusation. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and hostility. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to a personal attack by accusing AOC of supporting genocide without substantiation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it makes a serious accusation without evidence, which can mislead the public and harm the discourse. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.