In reply to:
Moderate Revolution
@TeddyVforUSC
·
476d
The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in a public debate about the credibility of a journalist's claims and the broader issue of political conspiracy theories. The tone is confrontational, with participants challenging each other's credibility and responses.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the confrontational tone could contribute to a hostile environment. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but engages in a public dispute that could affect the dignity of those involved.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on defending one's position. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of dialogue but does not offer constructive criticism or avoid personal attacks. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.