In reply to:
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
@AOC
·
490d
Keith Edwards
@keithedwards
·
490d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically policies and actions related to the Democratic Party and its representatives. The tone is confrontational and critical, aiming to hold public figures accountable for their actions and policy stances.
- The statement uses strong language and accusations, which could be seen as harmful. It does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use harsh language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it is accusatory and confrontational. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not do so constructively. It includes personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, particularly in the accusations of supporting 'fracking, caging kids, and genocide.'Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to hold public figures accountable, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. However, the confrontational tone may undermine this goal. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to its accusatory and confrontational nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.