Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically political figures and their actions, and contributes to civic dialogue.
- The statement uses strong language like 'genocidal Democrats' and 'pathetic,' which can be considered harmful and inflammatory, thus violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use derogatory language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses accusatory and divisive language. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks, calling AOC 'pathetic' and accusing her of 'punching left,' which violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, given its inflammatory and accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.