Jonny Paradise
@plantparadise7
·
125d
The statement and the accompanying conversation and image constitute public discourse as they engage with a significant public issue: the potential legal immunity for a corporation's products and its implications for public health and legislative integrity. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting that Bayer is engaging in unethical practices to avoid accountability for the safety of its products. The image reinforces the message by invoking a patriotic appeal to 'Make America Healthy Again,' suggesting that current practices are detrimental to public health.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by a corporation's actions, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone could be seen as inflammatory. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals but is critical of corporate actions and legislative processes, which is within the bounds of public discourse. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by raising awareness about potential health risks associated with pesticides, though it does so in a confrontational manner. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of corporate and legislative actions but could be seen as engaging in ad hominem attacks by accusing congresspeople of being bribed. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a public health issue, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.