Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) for her support of Kamala Harris and her opposition to Jill Stein, suggesting a contradiction in AOC's stance on antiwar issues. The accompanying image highlights Jill Stein's support among Muslim-American voters, potentially implying a reason for AOC's opposition. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to question AOC's consistency and motives.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a critical tone that could contribute to divisiveness. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as undermining the dignity of AOC by questioning her motives without substantial evidence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or evidence, leaning towards a personal attack on AOC's integrity. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.