Reposted by Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley
The statement by @RepPressley criticizes the GOP for prioritizing Trump's agenda and accuses them of intending harm through their budget policies. The tone is accusatory and urgent, aiming to highlight perceived dangers in the GOP's actions.
- The statement accuses the GOP of intending harm, which could be seen as a violation of striving to do no harm with words and actions. However, it is also a call to action to prevent perceived harm, which complicates the evaluation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make strong accusations against a group of people, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism and urgency. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a strong accusation without offering a path for dialogue or resolution. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to bring attention to a public issue, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by preventing perceived harm. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to address a public issue, but the tone and approach could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.