In reply to:
Mary McG
@MaryOCSI
·
472d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
472d
The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in public discourse by discussing post-9/11 secrecy, surveillance, and the implications for American liberty. The tone of the conversation is critical and accusatory, particularly towards Matt Taibbi, suggesting a strong disagreement with his actions or views. The conversation touches on significant societal issues such as government surveillance and the exploitation of national tragedies for personal gain.
- The statement and the conversation it is part of do not strive to do no harm. The accusatory tone and the use of terms like 'disgrace' can be seen as harmful and not conducive to constructive dialogue. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, particularly Matt Taibbi, by calling him a 'disgrace.' This can be seen as a form of cyberbullying or harassment. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters a hostile environment. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the issues at hand in a respectful manner. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.