Matt Taibbi

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 18
9/15/2024, 1:07:05 AM
X
In reply to:
Amerika 💩hole 🍌Republik
@3rdworldAmerika
·
470d
@mtaibbi But harris is worst vice president, right?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
470d
A hundred Trump presidencies couldn’t do the damage that Cheney did. I don’t think people appreciate how comprehensive his assault on the Constitution was/is.
Blu Man
@bluman302
·
470d
@mtaibbi I can’t tell if you’re pretending not to understand “Trump is so bad someone as vile as Dick Cheney sees that” is the point or you just don’t understand it

The statement '@3rdworldAmerika Until recently she’s been an all-time irrelevant VP.' constitutes public discourse as it engages in a discussion about the performance and relevance of a public official, specifically the Vice President of the United States. The tone is dismissive and critical, aiming to undermine the significance of the Vice President's role.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is dismissive and undermines the Vice President's relevance, which can be seen as harmful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the Vice President, as it dismisses her as 'irrelevant,' which can be seen as a form of disrespect. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a personal attack that dismisses the Vice President's relevance without providing substantive critique or engaging in a meaningful discussion. [-2]