Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and accompanying images provide detailed information about casualties in Gaza, including sensitive personal data such as names, ages, genders, and ID numbers. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue related to conflict and human rights.
- The statement aims to inform the public about the human cost of the conflict, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by raising awareness. However, the release of such detailed personal information could potentially cause harm to the families of the deceased. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The publication of names, ages, genders, and ID numbers of deceased individuals violates their privacy and dignity, as well as that of their families. This is a significant breach of privacy. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The intent behind the statement appears to be to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting the human toll of the conflict. However, the method of sharing detailed personal information may not be the most respectful or compassionate approach.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a serious issue, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. However, the manner in which the information is presented could be more responsible and considerate of privacy concerns. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.