Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Keith Ellison
@keithellison
·
473d
The statement criticizes Keith Ellison and other Democratic figures for their stance on the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement and suggests that their actions are inadvertently benefiting the Green Party. The tone is accusatory and critical, implying that these figures are acting out of self-interest rather than principle. The images and conversation provide context to the criticism, showing Ellison's stance on Israel and his criticism of Jill Stein.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses inflammatory language ('threw Palestinians under the bus,' 'attack dogs') which can be seen as harmful and divisive. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals mentioned, as it engages in personal attacks and derogatory language. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and animosity. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments rather than addressing the issues in a respectful manner. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.