Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the legacy of Ronald Reagan's policies and their impact on society. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to challenge the endorsement of Kamala Harris by former Reagan staffers by highlighting negative aspects of Reagan's presidency.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong, accusatory language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, particularly those who support Reagan or Harris, and could be seen as engaging in a form of cyberbullying or harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on condemnation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, particularly with the phrase 'you’re a cop.' [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does exercise free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, given its accusatory and divisive tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.