In reply to:
Max Blumenthal
@MaxBlumenthal
·
125d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to U.S. foreign policy, diplomacy, and the use of violence. The tone is highly critical and accusatory, suggesting that certain political groups prefer violent means over diplomatic solutions.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses inflammatory language ('feverish insanity') that could escalate tensions and contribute to polarization. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it makes broad and negative generalizations about a group of people ('Neocons and their intelligence apparatus allies'). (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and lacks a constructive approach to the issues discussed. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments rather than addressing the issues in a reasoned manner. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.