Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement attributes responsibility for the violence depicted in the image to the Biden-Harris administration, suggesting that their policies or actions have contributed to the situation. The tone is accusatory and places blame on specific political figures. The content is emotionally charged, given the graphic nature of the image and the tragic event it describes.
- The statement could be seen as doing harm by attributing blame in a highly charged and sensitive context without providing a nuanced analysis of the situation. This could exacerbate tensions and contribute to a polarized discourse. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved, particularly given the graphic nature of the image and the sensitive subject matter. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on assigning blame, which may hinder constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a direct accusation without providing a detailed argument or context, which could be seen as a form of personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to influence public opinion but does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal betterment, given its accusatory and polarizing nature. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.