The statement appears to be a promotional activity related to a public figure and a mission to address a public issue, specifically the global wildfire challenge. However, it does not provide substantive engagement with the issue itself within the statement. It merely mentions involvement and an ally, and links to an external website for more information.
- The statement does not cause harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does imply a positive mission.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in any form of criticism or dialogue, constructive or otherwise.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to draw attention to a societal issue, which can be seen as a positive use of influence. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.