Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Keith Ellison
@keithellison
·
471d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the actions and character of a public figure, Dr. Jill Stein, in the context of her involvement in the Free Assange movement. The statement responds to a critique by Keith Ellison, addressing public concerns about political behavior and advocacy.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It provides a factual account of Dr. Jill Stein's involvement in the Free Assange movement, which is a positive contribution to public discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting Dr. Jill Stein's efforts to raise awareness about Julian Assange's situation. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing evidence of Dr. Jill Stein's actions, rather than resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to better society by informing the public about Dr. Jill Stein's advocacy work, which can inspire others to engage in similar efforts. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by contributing to a meaningful discussion about a public figure's actions. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.