Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue involving a political figure's actions and their implications. The tone is critical and aims to provide clarity on a controversial topic.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as contributing to a negative portrayal of Dr. Jill Stein. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of Dr. Jill Stein, which could be seen as disrespectful.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory in nature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the actions and statements of Dr. Jill Stein. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to address a public concern, though the integrity of the discourse could be questioned. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.