Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to free speech, propaganda, and political accountability. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting a strong stance against Hillary Clinton's position and actions.
- The statement does not appear to strive to do no harm; it uses charged language like 'scam' and 'propaganda' which can be inflammatory. This could potentially harm the reputation of the individuals involved. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech directly, but it does use accusatory language that could be seen as disrespectful. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a confrontational tone. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, particularly by calling the Russiagate issue a 'scam' and attributing it to Clinton's campaign. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement addresses free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as irresponsible by making strong accusations without providing evidence within the statement itself. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.