In reply to:
The statement 'Ellison’s statements are terrifying' is a response to a conversation about the use of AI by big tech companies and its implications on privacy and human dignity. This conversation touches on public issues such as privacy, technology, and human rights, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a strong word 'terrifying' which could be seen as alarmist. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not show respect for the dignity of Ellison by using a strong negative adjective without further explanation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it lacks context and constructive content. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a personal attack on Ellison's statements without providing a reasoned argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.