Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses a significant geopolitical event involving Israel and Hezbollah, which is a matter of public concern and thus constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not explicitly promote harm, but it discusses a violent event, which could be seen as indirectly harmful by sensationalizing or spreading potentially inflammatory information. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does involve sensitive information about a violent event, which could impact the dignity of those involved.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on the tactical details of a violent event. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It presents information in a factual manner without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but must be evaluated for its responsibility and integrity in sharing potentially sensitive and inflammatory information.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.