Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically addressing political behavior and free speech in the context of a political rally. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting that Democrats are hypocritical in their stance on democracy and free speech.
- The statement does not directly incite harm, but its accusatory tone could contribute to a polarized and hostile environment. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a broad and negative generalization about a political group. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and antagonism. This is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a sweeping accusation without engaging in a reasoned argument or providing evidence. This is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by criticizing perceived suppression of free speech. However, it does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, as it makes broad accusations without substantiation. This is a minor alignment. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.