Christopher C. Cuomo

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -30
9/19/2024, 4:26:03 AM
X
In reply to:
Moosty,
@MustyBecks
·
179d
@ChrisCuomo When did America ever green light an indescribable targeting of 4000+ people across multiple geographic locations that are not the battlefield including civilian areas. Name one operation in Afghanistan or Iraq
Christopher C. Cuomo
@ChrisCuomo
·
179d
Why don't you mention the pagers were on members of a terrorist organization that is committed to destroying Israel? Would you have been defending al qaeda when America was lighting them up in Iraq?
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
@AOC
·
179d
Israel’s pager attack in Lebanon detonated thousands of handheld devices across of a slew of public spaces, seriously injuring and killing innocent civilians.

This attack clearly and unequivocally violates international humanitarian law and undermines US efforts to prevent a…

The statement by @MustyBecks constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about military actions, international law, and historical context. The tone is critical and aims to challenge the understanding of military operations and their implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to intend harm but rather to inform and challenge the understanding of military actions. It neither promotes nor condones violence. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on historical and factual arguments. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by encouraging research and providing historical context. However, it could be more empathetic in its delivery. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by challenging the previous comment's understanding of military operations. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to contribute to a public debate responsibly and with integrity. [+1]