Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically political support for a candidate and opposition to certain policies related to international conflict. The tone is assertive and promotional, aiming to rally support for Jill Stein and the Green Party while criticizing the establishment's stance on the Palestine conflict.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('unjust support of the war on Palestine') which could be seen as inflammatory. It does not explicitly promote violence or harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It criticizes policies rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and change by encouraging people to join a cause, but it lacks a tone of empathy and compassion towards differing viewpoints.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on policy criticism rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to rally support for a political cause, which can be seen as an attempt to better society according to the speaker's perspective. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform to promote a political agenda responsibly, though the language could be more measured. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.