Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a public issue involving student activism, corporate ethics, and labor rights. The tone is assertive and the intent is to inform and possibly mobilize public opinion regarding the students' demands for divestment from Boeing and their support for striking workers.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('genocide') which could be seen as inflammatory. This could be a minor violation of striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards the striking workers and the students' cause, though the use of the term 'genocide' could be seen as hyperbolic and potentially divisive. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to bring attention to a societal issue, aiming for the betterment of society by advocating for ethical investment and labor rights. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to responsibly raise awareness about the students' demands and the workers' strike. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.