Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically U.S. foreign policy and NATO's role in international conflicts. The tone is provocative and critical, aiming to highlight controversial viewpoints and elicit strong reactions from the audience.
- The statement does not directly incite violence or harm, but it does present a highly critical view that could be seen as inflammatory. This is a neutral adherence to the principle of doing no harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of individuals involved, adhering to this principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it seems designed to provoke and polarize, which is a violation of this principle. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It presents a controversial opinion without fostering a space for constructive debate, violating this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to significant public issues, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. However, the manner in which it does so is contentious. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses its platform to express a critical viewpoint, adhering to this principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.