In reply to:
Marina Medvin 🇺🇸
@MarinaMedvin
·
180d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the nature of political discourse and the impact of divisive rhetoric. The tone is critical but aims to promote a more constructive dialogue.
- The statement strives to do no harm by encouraging a more respectful and cogent form of argumentation, rather than attacking others. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by suggesting that attacking others is not necessary for making a cogent argument, thereby encouraging more respectful discourse. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the perceived flaws in the approach of the original poster without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.