Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement criticizes Vice President Harris's leadership on a specific public policy issue, namely the expansion of internet access. It implies a failure in the administration's execution of the plan and references a report by Politico to support its claim. The tone is critical and aims to hold a public figure accountable for perceived inaction or failure.
- The statement does not use harmful language but is critical of a public figure's performance. It does not appear to intend harm beyond holding the figure accountable.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on a public figure's professional responsibilities.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is critical but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the professional performance of Vice President Harris. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, but it does not appear to contain any factual errors that need correction.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to hold a public figure accountable, which is a responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.