The statement by Jill Stein constitutes public discourse as it engages with significant public issues, including international justice, war crimes, and U.S. foreign policy. The tone is accusatory and urgent, calling for accountability and justice for alleged war crimes. The content is critical of specific political figures and the U.S. government's role in international conflicts.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to hold individuals accountable for actions deemed harmful, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone and labeling of individuals as war criminals without due process could be seen as harmful.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the privacy of individuals but does not uphold their dignity, as it labels them as war criminals without a legal verdict. This could be seen as a form of public shaming.
 [-2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement promotes understanding and empathy for victims of war crimes but does so by harshly criticizing specific individuals, which may not foster compassion towards those accused.
 [-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in strong criticism but does not engage in constructive dialogue. It calls for legal action rather than negotiation or discussion, which could be seen as a form of personal attack.
 [-2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses the platform to advocate for justice and accountability, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. However, the approach may polarize opinions and not necessarily lead to constructive outcomes.
 [+1]