Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
461d
The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of war crimes and the need for diplomacy. The tone is critical and accusatory, particularly towards the interviewer and certain political figures. The intent appears to be to clarify a stance on war crimes and to criticize perceived biases in media questioning.
- The statement aims to do no harm by condemning war crimes and advocating for diplomacy, but the accusatory tone towards the interviewer and certain political figures could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others to some extent but engages in strong criticism of specific individuals, which could be seen as a form of public shaming. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by advocating for diplomacy and human rights, but the accusatory tone may undermine this effort. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of public figures and media practices but could be seen as engaging in personal attacks against the interviewer. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for the betterment of society by calling for accountability and diplomacy. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.