The statement expresses frustration and skepticism about the use of a story to support claims of illegal voting. It uses strong language and a dismissive tone to criticize what the author perceives as manipulative tactics in party politics.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement uses strong language ('bullshit') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, thus not fully upholding the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions.
 [-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of strong language could be seen as disrespectful.
 [-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it dismisses the opposing viewpoint without engaging in constructive dialogue.
 [-2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the opposing viewpoint with strong language, which could be seen as a personal attack or ad hominem argument.
 [-2]