Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a public issue involving police actions during a protest, which is a matter of public concern.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words and actions. It reports an incident involving the NYPD and a protester, which is a factual account. However, the use of '🚨BREAKING' could be seen as sensationalizing the event slightly.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not naming individuals involved in the incident. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on reporting an incident.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It reports on the actions of the NYPD without attacking individuals personally. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by reporting on a public issue. However, the link to 'x.com' is vague and could be misleading or irrelevant. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.