Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -42

The statement and accompanying image appear to engage in public discourse by addressing significant political figures and suggesting a controversial and provocative scenario involving drone assassinations. The tone is sensational and potentially inflammatory, which could contribute to public fear or misunderstanding.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it suggests a violent and extreme scenario that could incite fear or panic. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it involves public figures in a hypothetical violent scenario. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it sensationalizes violence. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a provocative and extreme hypothetical rather than reasoned argument. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society, as it could contribute to fear and division. [-2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly, as it sensationalizes violence and could be seen as irresponsible. [-2]