Jill Stien

Rank 42 of 47
|
Score -86

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the functioning of democracy, voter behavior, and the two-party system in the context of a political debate. It also references a specific political figure and a contentious issue, making it a substantive engagement with public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language like 'genocide,' which could be seen as inflammatory. This could be considered a minor violation of striving to do no harm.Ā [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity.Ā [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by encouraging people to vote for what they want and advocating for peace. However, the use of the term 'genocide' could be seen as polarizing rather than fostering compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the two-party system and does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It addresses the issue rather than attacking individuals.Ā [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to advocate for a political movement aimed at societal betterment by breaking free from the two-party system and promoting peace.Ā [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to discuss important societal issues responsibly, although the use of strong language could be seen as a minor deviation from integrity.