The statement critiques the field of misinformation studies, suggesting it is politically biased and ineffective. It implies that misinformation experts are predominantly left-leaning and that this bias affects their work. The statement also questions the legitimacy of misinformation studies as a field, suggesting it replaces objective journalism with political narratives.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by discrediting an entire field and its professionals without substantial evidence, potentially undermining trust in efforts to combat misinformation. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of misinformation experts, implying they are politically biased and ineffective. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division by suggesting a political bias in the field. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks on misinformation experts, rather than constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to criticize a field of study, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal betterment. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or with integrity, as it makes broad claims without substantial evidence. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.