The statement critiques the field of misinformation studies, suggesting it is politically biased and ineffective. It implies that misinformation experts are predominantly left-leaning and that this bias affects their work. The statement also questions the legitimacy of misinformation studies as a field, suggesting it replaces objective journalism with political narratives.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement could be seen as harmful by discrediting an entire field and its professionals without substantial evidence, potentially undermining trust in efforts to combat misinformation.
[-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not respect the dignity of misinformation experts, implying they are politically biased and ineffective.
[-2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division by suggesting a political bias in the field.
[-2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in personal attacks on misinformation experts, rather than constructive criticism.
[-2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses its platform to criticize a field of study, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal betterment.
[-1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or with integrity, as it makes broad claims without substantial evidence.
[-2]