Bret Baier

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 54

The statement and the linked article focus on the fundraising efforts of Kamala Harris compared to Donald Trump, which is a substantive engagement with public issues, particularly in the context of political campaigns and elections. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual report on fundraising numbers. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement is neutral and factual, and does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on fundraising data. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By providing factual information about campaign fundraising, the statement uses influence to inform the public, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by sharing factual information. [+1]