Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a strong, emotionally charged critique of U.S. foreign policy and its implications for the conflict in Gaza. It directly addresses a public issue, namely the U.S. support for Israel and its impact on Palestinian civilians, particularly children. The tone is accusatory and aims to influence public opinion against a specific political ticket.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, particularly in its accusatory tone. It does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use inflammatory language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it uses emotionally charged language to provoke a reaction. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a direct personal attack on the Harris-Walz ticket. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to bring attention to a significant issue, but it does so in a divisive manner. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to its inflammatory and accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.