Peter Diamandis

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 178

The statement addresses a societal issue regarding the increasing preference for AI companions over human connections and raises a question about how society should handle humanoid robot-human relationships in the future. The tone is neutral and inquisitive, aiming to provoke thought and discussion on a relevant public concern.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm with words and actions as it neutrally raises a question for consideration. [+2]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by encouraging a discussion on the implications of AI companions on human relationships. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by posing a question rather than making personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence for the betterment of society by addressing a future societal issue that could have significant implications. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by fostering a thoughtful discussion. [+2]