Jill Stien

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -71

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the perceived inadequacies of the two-party political system in the United States and suggesting that it leads to significant societal issues. The tone is critical and urgent, aiming to provoke thought and action regarding political reform.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight systemic issues and does not appear to intend harm, but the use of strong language like 'genocide' and 'WWIII' could be seen as alarmist and potentially harmful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals, focusing on systemic issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of a viewpoint that the two-party system is problematic, but the extreme language may hinder empathy and compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the political system without personal attacks, but the extreme language could be seen as inflammatory rather than conducive to dialogue.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to call for political reform, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles but should be mindful of the responsibility to avoid alarmist language that could incite fear or panic.