Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
·
175d
The statement and the referenced conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with public issues, specifically the endorsement of a political candidate by national security officials and the implications of such endorsements. The tone is confrontational and challenges the political alignment of liberals with the defense establishment.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but its confrontational tone could contribute to polarization. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does challenge the dignity of those it addresses by implying a binary choice.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more divisive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a confrontational approach and implies a personal attack on political alignment. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly to foster constructive dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.