Kamala Harris
@KamalaHarris
·
458d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the upcoming presidential debate, and involves public figures. The tone is confrontational and challenges another public figure to participate in a debate, while also referencing legal actions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a confrontational tone that could escalate tensions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the term 'chicken out' could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on challenging and provoking. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a personal attack by implying cowardice with 'chicken out.'Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but could be seen as using the platform irresponsibly due to its confrontational nature.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.