The statement engages in public discourse as it addresses a public issue related to the promotion of science and its constitutional basis, and it involves a political party (GOP). The tone is somewhat confrontational and implies criticism of the GOP for not promoting science.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the confrontational tone could be seen as divisive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does single out a political group.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it implies a personal attack on the GOP. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech but could be seen as not using the platform responsibly due to its confrontational tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.